This has been pushed to the extreme with recent technological advancements, most specifically the prevalence of the internet, and portable technology. At any almost any moment, people can access any one of billions of images. Undoubtedly, this has had (and will continue to) have a significant effect on any art which can be effectively captured by a camera. In response to the powerful forces of technology, art became more and more about ideas rather than its formal characteristics. This birthed movements like Fluxus, and other forms of conceptual art, which could not be captured effectively by a single picture.
However, with the rise of virtual reality technology, these experiences, which were previously impervious to electronic distribution, may be able to be circulated via the internet as well. It seems as though the battle between art and mass media will continue indefinitely. Given that artists have successfully reconceptualized the artistic practice throughout history, it seems likely that fine art and mass media will remain distinct.
In the spirit of this blog post, I thought it would be worthwhile to mention Google’s VR painting application, which allows the user to paint in a three-dimensional VR space. At the very least, it presents an interesting adaptation of the traditional canvas with contemporary technology.
Add yours Comments – 1
Great commentary Jeff. This gives us so much to talk about. What is art? How do we recognize it? How has technology (especially new technologies like the digital image, which can be replicated with such ease and speed) complicated this ongoing question? Can everyone be an artist now, just like everyone can be a producer, instead of a consumer?